<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtual Desktops for your HP mini-note running Windows XP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hpmininotepc.com/2008/06/24/virtual-desktops-for-your-hp-mini-note-running-windows-xp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hpmininotepc.com/2008/06/24/virtual-desktops-for-your-hp-mini-note-running-windows-xp/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 05:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://hpmininotepc.com/2008/06/24/virtual-desktops-for-your-hp-mini-note-running-windows-xp/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 23:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpmininotepc.com/?p=36#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Cheers for the tip.  I might giv this a go.  With relation to memory usage, do you see any performance gains in running apps in a virtual desktop rather than in multiple windows?  I would have imagined virtual desktops would have been more of a memory hog than simply letting XP manage the windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers for the tip.  I might giv this a go.  With relation to memory usage, do you see any performance gains in running apps in a virtual desktop rather than in multiple windows?  I would have imagined virtual desktops would have been more of a memory hog than simply letting XP manage the windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
  

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.343 seconds -->

